What Is the Janice Griffith Lawsuit?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit is a single-plaintiff personal injury case against Dan Bilzerian and Hustler's operating company, not a class action or multidistrict litigation. Griffith, an adult film performer, reportedly broke her foot during a 2014 Hustler photo shoot in which Bilzerian threw her from a roof toward a pool.
Her attorney, Shoham Solouki, first demanded $85,000 before filing. Courthouse News and other outlets then reported the complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court in December 2014 and naming Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group LLC, which does business as Hustler Magazine.
Why Was the Janice Griffith Lawsuit Filed?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit was filed because Griffith said the roof stunt left her with a broken foot and her demand for compensation was rejected. Her attorney asked Bilzerian's representatives for $85,000, according to Above the Law and the ABA Journal, and Bilzerian refused to pay.
Bilzerian's attorney, Tom Goldstein, answered in a letter dated May 12, 2014 that Griffith was under contract to Hustler and agreed to be photographed being thrown. He wrote that she had been told in advance that grabbing his shirt would stop her from reaching the pool, and he called a negligence claim sanctionably frivolous.
Griffith sued anyway in December 2014. These are the parties' own positions, and no court is known to have ruled on either side's account.
What Harms Does the Janice Griffith Lawsuit Allege?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit alleges two connected harms, one physical injury and one legal wrong. Public reporting describes the injury and the negligence theory, but the complaint itself was not available for this page.
Foot Fracture
A foot fracture is a break in one or more of the bones of the foot, and treatment can range from rest and a brace to surgery.
Griffith reportedly broke her foot when the stunt ended. ABA Journal and Above the Law both report the broken foot as the injury behind her $85,000 demand.
The reports reviewed do not describe her treatment or recovery time, and no medical records have been published.
Negligence
Negligence is a legal claim that someone failed to use reasonable care and that the failure caused another person's injury.
Secondary case summaries describe the filed claim as a personal injury action based on negligence against Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group. The central dispute is whether a performer who agreed to a stunt can still recover when it goes wrong.
Goldstein's letter argues that she assumed the risk. Griffith's side has not been quoted at length in the sources reviewed, so that argument remains untested in any published ruling.
What Is the Current Status of the Janice Griffith Lawsuit?
The current status of the Janice Griffith lawsuit is that it is reported closed. Secondary case summaries describe a dismissal with prejudice in December 2015, but the Los Angeles Superior Court docket could not be accessed to confirm it for this page.
Griffith v. LFP Internet Group LLC, et al.
The case was filed on December 16, 2014 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Both defendants reportedly filed cross-complaints in early 2015, and Griffith's attorney reportedly requested a dismissal with prejudice on December 7, 2015.
| Court | Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles |
| Case Number | BC566899 (per secondary case summaries, not verified against the docket) |
| Filed | December 16, 2014 |
| Defendants | Dan Bilzerian; LFP Internet Group LLC (Hustler Magazine) |
| Reported Outcome | Dismissal with prejudice, December 2015 (secondary sources) |
| Settlement Terms | Not publicly disclosed |
A dismissal with prejudice means the same claims generally cannot be filed again. It does not by itself show who won, since parties often dismiss after a private agreement. One secondary site places the dismissal in 2016, so the exact date should be treated as unconfirmed.
Did Janice Griffith Settle the Lawsuit?
No. No court ruling or party statement publicly confirms that Janice Griffith settled her lawsuit. A reported dismissal with prejudice suggests a private resolution, but no amount or terms have been disclosed.
Some low-quality legal marketing sites state a payout or confirmed settlement. None cites a court record or a named party, so those claims are unverified.
The only dollar figure tied to the dispute is the $85,000 Griffith's attorney demanded before filing. That number was an opening demand, not a verdict or payment.
Latest Janice Griffith Lawsuit Updates
The Janice Griffith lawsuit updates below follow the 2014 injury, the pre-suit letters, the December 2014 complaint, and the reported 2015 dismissal as each was reported.
Full Janice Griffith Lawsuit Timeline
Dismissal Remains Confirmed Only by Secondary Sources
A review of news coverage and legal-news summaries found no trial verdict and no disclosed settlement in the Janice Griffith lawsuit. The Los Angeles Superior Court docket could not be accessed, so the reported December 2015 dismissal rests on secondary summaries.
Dismissal With Prejudice Reportedly Requested
A secondary case summary reports that Griffith's attorney filed a request for dismissal with prejudice in Los Angeles County Superior Court on December 7, 2015, and that the court closed the action later that month.
Hustler's Operating Company Reportedly Files Cross-Complaint
A secondary case summary reports that LFP Internet Group filed a partial answer and a cross-complaint on January 16, 2015, and that Bilzerian filed his own on February 3, 2015.
Griffith Files Suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court
Griffith sued Dan Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group LLC, which does business as Hustler Magazine, in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Courthouse News and other outlets reported the complaint under headlines about the model suing Hustler.
ABA Journal Reports Goldstein's Assumption-of-Risk Argument
The ABA Journal reported that Tom Goldstein's letter argued Griffith agreed to the stunt, assumed the risk, and would obviously lose, and that Bilzerian would not settle. At that point Griffith had only threatened to sue.
Goldstein Sends Letter to Griffith's Attorney
Bilzerian's attorney Tom Goldstein wrote to Griffith's attorney Shoham Solouki responding to the $85,000 demand. The letter later spread widely online and was published by outlets including Above the Law and Legal Cheek.
Reports Say Griffith Broke Her Foot in the Stunt
Entertainment and news outlets, including HuffPost UK, reported that Griffith broke her foot after Dan Bilzerian threw her from a roof toward a pool during a Hustler photo shoot. Video of the stunt circulated online.
What Evidence Would a Janice Griffith Lawsuit Need?
A personal injury case like the Janice Griffith lawsuit generally turns on proof of what was agreed, what happened, and what it cost. The items below come from facts that reporters and attorneys cited:
- The video of the stunt, which Goldstein's letter says shows Griffith grabbing Bilzerian's shirt.
- Her contract with Hustler and any consent she gave to the stunt, which Goldstein cited as proof she agreed.
- Evidence of any safety planning, including what she was told in advance about the throw and the distance to the pool.
- Medical records of the broken foot and any related lost income.
Who Were the Defendants in the Janice Griffith Lawsuit?
Two defendants were named in the Janice Griffith lawsuit. No court is known to have assigned responsibility to either of them.
| Defendant | Reported Role | Public Position |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Bilzerian | Threw Griffith from the roof during the shoot | His attorney argued she agreed to the stunt and assumed the risk, and said he would not settle |
| LFP Internet Group LLC (Hustler Magazine) | Hired Griffith for the photo shoot, according to Goldstein's letter | Reportedly filed a cross-complaint in January 2015 |
The cross-complaint detail comes from a secondary case summary and was not checked against the court docket.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Janice Griffith lawsuit about?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit is a personal injury case over a broken foot she reportedly suffered in a 2014 Hustler photo shoot stunt. She sued Dan Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group in Los Angeles County Superior Court in December 2014.
Is the Janice Griffith lawsuit a class action?
No. The Janice Griffith lawsuit is not a class action or multidistrict litigation. It was a single-plaintiff personal injury case with two named defendants.
Who did Janice Griffith sue?
Janice Griffith sued Dan Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group LLC, which does business as Hustler Magazine. The case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court in December 2014.
Did Janice Griffith settle her lawsuit?
No settlement by Janice Griffith has been publicly confirmed, and no amount has been disclosed. Secondary case summaries report a dismissal with prejudice in December 2015, which often follows a private agreement.
How much did Janice Griffith ask for in her lawsuit?
Janice Griffith's attorney reportedly asked for $85,000 before the lawsuit was filed. That figure was a pre-suit demand, and the complaint's own damages amount was not confirmed.
Why did Bilzerian's lawyer say Janice Griffith would lose?
Bilzerian's lawyer said Janice Griffith would lose because she agreed to the stunt and assumed the risk. His letter said she was under contract to Hustler and had been told in advance that grabbing his shirt would stop her from reaching the pool.